Fourth District Court of Appeals rules for the insurance company and is critical of the provider’s strained analysis in alleging an ambiguity in the policy language.
Submitted by Sandra Rodrigue on 13 Oct, 2020
Recently the Fourth District Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Plantation Open MRI v. Infinity Indemnity Insurance Company which ruled favorably for the insurer on whether a PIP insurance policy requires the insurer to pay more than 80% of the statutory fee schedule if one part of the policy…